The comparative law of international arbitration between France and England, on the occasion of the current reform of international arbitration law
![Picture of the conference The Review of the Arbitration Act 1996 by the Law Commission. A Comparative Perspective between English and French Arbitration Law. Picture of the conference The Review of the Arbitration Act 1996 by the Law Commission. A Comparative Perspective between English and French Arbitration Law.](https://llm-awards.assas-universite.fr/sites/default/files/styles/1172_465_article_top/public/llm_awards/images/the_review-arbitration_act_1996_by_the_law_commission-09112022.jpg?itok=i1tJiSDU)
This conference gathered about one hundred people at the Institute of Comparative Law, who were able to hear the following presentations by the speakers:
The Review of the Arbitration Act 1996 by the Law Commission. A Comparative Perspective between English and French Arbitration Law.
Introduction. Me Jacob GRIERSON & Pr Malik LAAZOUZI
Pr Jean-Sébastien BORGHETTI, Reforming the law of arbitration in England and in France. A comparative perspective
Pr Nathan TAMBLYN, Vocal stakeholders and historic international conventions: law reform challenges in the context of arbitration confidentiality and discrimination
Questions
Pr Pierre MAYER, The jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal. A comparative perspective
Me Jacob GRIESON, Disclosure-Révélation. A comparative perspective
Pr Malik LAAZOUZI, The law applicable to the arbitration agreement. A comparative perspective